This is a directory category: every listing of one type. Open a profile, or read the newsletter →
Directory › Compliance & KYC
Tokenization compliance and KYC
Regulated assets cannot change hands freely between anonymous wallets. Compliance tooling makes tokens follow the rules: identity checks before a wallet may hold a token, transfer restrictions coded into the token, and blockchain analytics that screen addresses for links to sanctions or illicit activity.
Token standards such as ERC-3643 build these checks into the token itself, so a transfer only succeeds if both parties meet the issuer's eligibility rules. Analytics providers help issuers, exchanges and regulators trace flows and meet anti-money-laundering obligations.
The listings below cover analytics providers and permissioned token standards. Requirements differ by jurisdiction and asset type; the project pages cite official sources and none of them is legal advice.
Projects in this category (3)
| Name | Organisation | Type | Chains | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chainalysis | Chainalysis | Tool | – | 23 Oct 2026 |
| Elliptic | Elliptic | Tool | – | 23 Oct 2026 |
| ERC-3643 Association | ERC-3643 Association | Standard | Ethereum and EVM chains | 23 Oct 2026 |
- Chainalysis: Blockchain data platform for transaction monitoring, sanctions screening and investigations.
- Elliptic: Blockchain analytics and crypto-compliance tools: wallet screening, transaction monitoring and stablecoin risk management.
- ERC-3643 Association: Industry body behind ERC-3643, the token standard for permissioned RWA tokens with on-chain identity and transfer rules.
Every listing was checked against the official sources linked on its page. Information only, not investment advice. Eligibility, availability and supported chains change; confirm on the official site before acting. Spotted an error? Reply to any edition of the newsletter.
How to compare compliance tools
Compliance tooling sits at different layers of a tokenized product. Compare:
- Layer: identity verification, on-chain transfer rules or transaction monitoring.
- Coverage of jurisdictions and sanctions lists.
- Integration with token standards such as ERC-3643 and with custodians.
- Data handling: what personal data is stored, where and by whom.
- Audit trail: how decisions can be evidenced to regulators.
Who uses compliance tools
Issuers and transfer agents use identity and eligibility checks to decide who may hold a token; exchanges and custodians screen deposits and withdrawals; banks and payment firms monitor stablecoin flows; and regulators and investigators use analytics to trace funds. Token standards with built-in rules let the same checks follow a token wherever it moves on-chain, which matters when tokens can be transferred at any hour without an intermediary approving each trade. Choosing tools is therefore part of product design, not an afterthought added once a token is live.
Risks and limits
Tools support compliance but do not replace legal responsibility: issuers remain accountable for who holds their securities. Blockchain analytics produce risk scores, not proof, and can flag innocent addresses. Identity data creates privacy obligations of its own. Nothing here is legal advice.
Guides
Frequently asked questions
- What is KYC in tokenization?
- Know Your Customer checks that verify an investor's identity and eligibility before their wallet is allowed to receive a regulated token.
- What is ERC-3643?
- An Ethereum token standard for permissioned tokens that checks on-chain identity and eligibility rules before allowing a transfer.
- Why do tokenized securities restrict transfers?
- Securities laws limit who may hold certain assets. Transfer restrictions keep the token register aligned with those rules.
- Can a compliant token still be transferred on a public blockchain?
- Yes. Permissioned tokens can live on public chains; the token's smart contract simply rejects transfers to wallets that have not passed the issuer's checks.
- Does blockchain analytics prove that funds are illicit?
- No. Analytics tools produce risk indicators based on transaction patterns and known addresses. They support investigations and screening but need human review and other evidence.
